About

Methodology & data sources

Mixed data provenance. Impaired-water records are imported directly from the State Water Resources Control Board Final 2026 California Integrated Report (Appendix A), including official waterbody identifiers, listing decisions, TMDL status, and Water Board GIS geometry. Stormwater facility, permit, monitoring, and compliance records remain demonstration data pending SMARTS and CIWQS ingestion, and facility-to-waterbody relationships are derived geographically rather than taken from any Water Board finding.

Impaired waters: Final 2026 California Integrated Report (published cycle — the 303(d) list is not a daily feed).

Last imported: Aug 21, 2026, 01:57 AM UTC

Impaired waters — official source

Agency: California State Water Resources Control Board

Report: Final 2026 California Integrated Report — Clean Water Act 303(d) List

Dataset: Appendix A — 2026 303(d) List of Impaired Waters

Coverage in this build: 1,679 listed waterbodies, 5,962 listing decisions, 1,669 with official geometry.

Source systems modeled

  • • SMARTS — industrial stormwater permit coverage, monitoring, and reporting.
  • • NPDES / CIWQS — permits, violations, and enforcement actions.
  • • 303(d) Impaired Waters List — listed pollutants and TMDL status.
  • • GIS watershed layers — watershed and receiving-water relationships.

SMARTS TMDL requirements — official source

  • • Source: SMARTS "Download NOI Data By Regional Board" — TMDL dataset, retrieved per Regional Water Board. Records are keyed on WDID.
  • • Every limit value, limit period, exceedance basis, due date, TMDL name, and receiving water name is reproduced exactly as stated by the Water Board. Nothing is restated, rounded, or converted.
  • • Only Regions 4 (Los Angeles), 8 (Santa Ana), and 9 (San Diego) currently publish industrial TMDL requirements, so an absent requirement is not evidence that a facility discharges to an unimpaired water.
  • • Records whose stated permit ID is blank (permit not yet issued) and lines malformed by an embedded tab are rejected at import and counted, never silently altered.
  • • Derived: the parameter is matched to the 303(d) pollutant vocabulary, and the stated receiving-water name is linked to a 2026 303(d) waterbody only on an exact normalized name match. Most stated names are watershed- or reach-level descriptions that do not match a single 303(d) segment, and those are left unlinked rather than fuzzily matched.
  • • No comparison is made between reported monitoring results and stated TMDL limits. The application makes no exceedance, violation, Level 1 / Level 2, or compliance determination.

Numeric Action Level comparison — derived, auditable

  • • Rulebook: the Numeric Action Levels of the Industrial General Permit are transcribed from the adopted Orders — Order 2014-0057-DWQ (effective 1 July 2015) and its 2018 amendment — and stored as versioned rules with effective dates, thresholds, units, averaging basis, exceedance basis, and the source section for each parameter. Order 97-03-DWQ, in effect before 1 July 2015, adopted no NALs and no comparison is made for reporting years it governed.
  • • Reporting year: the permit reporting cycle of 1 July – 30 June. Each year is evaluated against the permit version in effect for that year.
  • • Eligibility: only numeric analytical results from permitted discharge locations, in units convertible to the NAL units, and for parameters with an adopted NAL. Every excluded sample is counted and given a machine-readable reason (no NAL for the parameter, incompatible units, non-effluent sampling location, no numeric result) rather than being dropped silently.
  • • Annual NALs are compared against the arithmetic average of eligible results for the reporting year, with non-detects treated as zero. Instantaneous maximum NALs (total suspended solids, oil and grease, pH) are exceeded when two or more eligible results in the reporting year fall outside the level; pH is a range (6.0 – 9.0), not a maximum.
  • • Every calculated figure is published with its inputs: eligible sample count, excluded sample count, non-detects counted as zero, samples above the threshold, applicable threshold and units, calculation method, ruleset version and calculation version.
  • • An NAL exceedance is a permit-defined condition that triggers Exceedance Response Actions. It is not a violation, an enforcement action, a Level 1 / Level 2 determination, or any Water Board compliance finding, and the application makes none of those claims.
  • • Pollutant overlap between an NAL exceedance and a 303(d) listing for the same pollutant is informational co-occurrence over a derived spatial association. It is not evidence of causation or contribution.

How relationships are classified

  • Confirmed receiving water — the permit record names the receiving waterbody.
  • Hydrologically associated — the facility sits in the same watershed as the impaired segment.
  • Nearby — spatial proximity only; no established discharge pathway.

Interpretation limits

Intelligence indicators summarize publicly available regulatory and geographic information and are not official Water Board compliance determinations.