Mb Tech

Active WDID 5F10I003763 Fresno, Fresno County Region 5F · Central Valley (Fresno)

At a glance

Permit Evidence: SMARTS record
Active Industrial
Notice of Intent (WDID code I) · Permits and applications
Location Evidence: facility-reported
Fresno, Fresno County
Region 5F · Central Valley (Fresno) · Location · Statewide map
Receiving water
San Joaquin River (as reported by the facility)
Evidence: candidate, awaiting review Details
Identified receiving water on the 2026 303(d) list
Not established
Shown only when the reported receiving water is identified and corroborated.
2026 Integrated Report waters within 1.0 km Evidence: geographic proximity
None
Monitoring results Evidence: facility-reported
3 distinct results, 1 reporting year (2015 to 2015)
Most recent sample Nov 02, 2015 · Monitoring
Compliance and enforcement records Evidence: SMARTS record
1 inspection · 0 violation records · 2 enforcement actions
Counts as published in SMARTS; not a compliance determination · Details
SMARTS TMDL records Evidence: SMARTS-reported
0 records
TMDL records

Each label shows where a statement comes from. How to read the labels.

Overview and location

Reported facility location HUC12 watershed Corroborated receiving water 2026 Integrated Report waterbodies nearby

Open this facility on the statewide map

Reported location Evidence: facility-reported

Coordinates
36.741366, -119.82206
Precision
5 decimal places
Shared point
No
Matches application record
same

Facility location as reported by the discharger in SMARTS; not a discharge point or outfall.

Facility address
188 S Teilman Ave, Fresno 93706
Regional Water Board
5F — Central Valley (Fresno)

HUC12 watershed Evidence: spatial

  • Fanning Ditch-Fish Slough HUC12 180300090506

The facility's reported location lies within this HUC12 watershed (spatial derivation); it is not a discharge location.

Permits and applications Evidence: SMARTS record

Current permit record

Permit type
Industrial
Application type
Notice of Intent (WDID code I)
Status
Active
Operator
MB Tech
Primary industry (SIC)
2952-Asphalt Felts and Coatings
Application ID
195728
NOI processed
Apr 06, 1992
Last certified
Apr 22, 2015
Facility size
5 Acres

Retrieved from SMARTS Oct 20, 2026. Verify against SMARTS before relying on it.

Permit history

Storm water applications for this WDID, newest first
ApplicationTypeStatusProcessedTerminatedCertified
195728 IndustrialActiveApr 06, 1992 —Apr 22, 2015

Every storm water application SMARTS records for this WDID, newest first (1).

Receiving water

Reported by the facility Evidence: facility-reported
San Joaquin River
Discharges directly / indirectly
N / Y (as answered in the permit application)

Evidence: not confirmed Evidence: candidate, awaiting review Awaiting review

Receiving-water text as reported by the discharger in SMARTS; no waterbody identification has been confirmed.

Why it is not confirmed (1)
  • C1 name is only a prefix of official names

11 official waterbodies share this name; none is assigned without review.

Impaired waters and TMDLs

Two kinds of information, kept apart: 2026 Integrated Report waterbodies near the reported location (geographic proximity only), and TMDL records that SMARTS lists for this facility. Neither establishes where the facility discharges; see Receiving water for the facility's own statement.

Nearby waterbodies Evidence: geographic proximity

Spatial proximity only; discharge pathway not established. Being near a waterbody does not mean the facility discharges to it.

No 2026 Integrated Report waterbody lies within the proximity threshold of the reported location.

SMARTS TMDL records Evidence: SMARTS-reported

No TMDL records for this facility in the SMARTS TMDL export.

Reported monitoring results Evidence: facility-reported

Numeric Action Level (NAL) screening is being independently validated and is not shown. Nothing on this page states whether a result exceeded a NAL.

3 distinct measurements across 3 parameters, most recent sample Nov 02, 2015.

By reporting year

Distinct results by reporting year
Reporting year (July–June)Distinct resultsParametersWith several versionsFirst sampleLast sample
201533 0 Nov 02, 2015Nov 02, 2015

By parameter

Distinct results by parameter
ParameterUnitsMeasurementsBelow detectionFirst sampleLast sampleResults
pHSU1 0Nov 02, 2015Nov 02, 2015 Results
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)mg/L1 0Nov 02, 2015Nov 02, 2015 Results
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)mg/L1 0Nov 02, 2015Nov 02, 2015 Results

All results (3 distinct rows)

Reported monitoring results, newest first
Sample dateParameterResultUnitsLocation typeEventMethodReportVersions
Nov 02, 2015 pH 7.13 SU Effluent Qualifying Storm Event pH_Field 875698
Nov 02, 2015 Total Organic Carbon (TOC) 6.7 mg/L Effluent Qualifying Storm Event A5310B 875698
Nov 02, 2015 Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 12 mg/L Effluent Qualifying Storm Event A2540D 875698

Results are shown exactly as reported by the discharger. Identical rows repeated in the State's export are shown once. Where the export contains different versions of the same sample and parameter, each version is listed and flagged. Details.

Compliance and enforcement records Evidence: SMARTS record

These are records as the State Water Board publishes them in SMARTS, with the source's own types and statuses. They are not a compliance determination or rating. A record listed here is not proof of a violation beyond what the source states, and the absence of records does not establish compliance.

Compliance and enforcement records by type
Record typeRecordsAs publishedDatesRetrievedList
Violations0 0 Violation · 0 Potential (preliminary) · 0 Dismissed — Oct 21, 2026
Enforcement actions2 2 issued · 0 draft · 0 withdrawn, rescinded or superseded Jun 17, 2009 – Apr 03, 2012 Oct 21, 2026 All actions
Inspections1inspections, not findings Mar 30, 2016 – Mar 30, 2016 Oct 21, 2026 All inspections
Annual reports11certified reports (contents not shown) 2015 – 2025 Oct 21, 2026 All reports
Water-quality-based corrective action reports0reports, by parameter — Oct 21, 2026

Each record type is counted by its own SMARTS identifier. A violation and the enforcement action that cites it are two records in two lists; they are never added together.

Chronological record history (14 records, newest first)
Compliance and enforcement records, newest first
DateRecordIDType or purposeStatus as publishedDetail
Jul 13, 2026 Annual reports 1336678 Annual report 2025 —
Jul 11, 2025 Annual reports 1295552 Annual report 2024 —
Jul 11, 2024 Annual reports 1244702 Annual report 2023 —
Jul 10, 2023 Annual reports 1190771 Annual report 2022 —
Jun 07, 2022 Annual reports 1114272 Annual report 2021 —
Jun 15, 2021 Annual reports 1070351 Annual report 2020 —
Jun 17, 2020 Annual reports 987734 Annual report 2019 —
Jun 18, 2019 Annual reports 955354 Annual report 2018 —
Jul 10, 2018 Annual reports 940774 Annual report 2017 —
Jul 11, 2017 Annual reports 880123 Annual report 2016 —
Aug 02, 2016 Annual reports 839833 Annual report 2015 —
Mar 30, 2016 Inspections 2029130 B Type compliance —No Further Action
Apr 03, 2012 Enforcement actions 408496 SEL (Staff Enforcement Letter) Historical
Jun 17, 2009 Enforcement actions 366207 NOV (Notice of Violation) Historical

Sources and provenance

Sources behind this page
InformationSourceRetrieved or published
Permit, location, receiving-water textSMARTS Industrial Application Specific DataOct 20, 2026
Permit historySMARTS Storm Water ApplicationsOct 20, 2026
Monitoring resultsSMARTS Industrial Parameter DataOct 20, 2026
Watershed Boundary Dataset HU2 GeoPackages 15, 16, 18 (WBDHU12)USGS2026-10-22
2026 California Integrated Report, Appendix A: 2026 303(d) List (final)SWRCB2026-10-22
Final_2026_Rivers_and_Streams + Final_2026_Lakes_and_Reservoirs (FeatureServer 0)SWRCB GIS2026-10-22
SMARTS TMDL requirementsSMARTS2026-10-21

Relationships computed 2026-10-22 with methods facility_huc12/1, proximity/1, receiving_water/2, tmdl_reference/1, waterbody_huc12_ovl/1, waterbody_huc12_pub/1; proximity threshold 1.0 km.

How to read the evidence labels

Records are shown as published and are not compliance determinations. How geographic context is derived.