Tehama Cnty

Active WDID 5R52I001897 Gerber, Tehama County Region 5R · Central Valley (Redding)

At a glance

Permit Evidence: SMARTS record
Active Industrial
Notice of Intent (WDID code I) · Permits and applications
Location Evidence: facility-reported
Gerber, Tehama County
Region 5R · Central Valley (Redding) · Location · Statewide map
Receiving water
Jackson Creek (as reported by the facility)
Evidence: candidate, awaiting review Details
Identified receiving water on the 2026 303(d) list
Not established
Shown only when the reported receiving water is identified and corroborated.
2026 Integrated Report waters within 1.0 km Evidence: geographic proximity
None
Monitoring results Evidence: facility-reported
267 distinct results, 8 reporting years (2015 to 2022)
Most recent sample Dec 01, 2022 · Monitoring
Compliance and enforcement records Evidence: SMARTS record
2 inspections · 8 violation records · 7 enforcement actions
Counts as published in SMARTS; not a compliance determination · Details
SMARTS TMDL records Evidence: SMARTS-reported
0 records
TMDL records

Each label shows where a statement comes from. How to read the labels.

Overview and location

Reported facility location HUC12 watershed Corroborated receiving water 2026 Integrated Report waterbodies nearby

Open this facility on the statewide map

Reported location Evidence: facility-reported

Coordinates
40.064256, -122.157619
Precision
6 decimal places
Shared point
No
Matches application record
same

Facility location as reported by the discharger in SMARTS; not a discharge point or outfall.

Facility address
9380 San Benito, Gerber 96035
Regional Water Board
5R — Central Valley (Redding)

HUC12 watershed Evidence: spatial

  • Rodeo Creek-Sacramento River HUC12 180201560607

The facility's reported location lies within this HUC12 watershed (spatial derivation); it is not a discharge location.

Permits and applications Evidence: SMARTS record

Current permit record

Permit type
Industrial
Application type
Notice of Intent (WDID code I)
Status
Active
Operator
Tehama Cnty
Primary industry (SIC)
4231-Terminal and Joint Terminal Maintenance Facilities for Motor Freight Transportation
Application ID
197681
NOI processed
Mar 31, 1992
Last certified
Aug 05, 2026
Facility size
7 Acres
Impervious area
38 %

Retrieved from SMARTS Oct 20, 2026. Verify against SMARTS before relying on it.

Permit history

Storm water applications for this WDID, newest first
ApplicationTypeStatusProcessedTerminatedCertified
197681 IndustrialActiveMar 31, 1992 —Aug 05, 2026

Every storm water application SMARTS records for this WDID, newest first (1).

Receiving water

Reported by the facility Evidence: facility-reported
Jackson Creek
Discharges directly / indirectly
N / Y (as answered in the permit application)

Evidence: not confirmed Evidence: candidate, awaiting review Awaiting review

Receiving-water text as reported by the discharger in SMARTS; no waterbody identification has been confirmed.

Why it is not confirmed (1)
  • C1 name is only a prefix of official names

1 official waterbody shares this name; none is assigned without review.

Impaired waters and TMDLs

Two kinds of information, kept apart: 2026 Integrated Report waterbodies near the reported location (geographic proximity only), and TMDL records that SMARTS lists for this facility. Neither establishes where the facility discharges; see Receiving water for the facility's own statement.

Nearby waterbodies Evidence: geographic proximity

Spatial proximity only; discharge pathway not established. Being near a waterbody does not mean the facility discharges to it.

No 2026 Integrated Report waterbody lies within the proximity threshold of the reported location.

SMARTS TMDL records Evidence: SMARTS-reported

No TMDL records for this facility in the SMARTS TMDL export.

Reported monitoring results Evidence: facility-reported

Numeric Action Level (NAL) screening is being independently validated and is not shown. Nothing on this page states whether a result exceeded a NAL.

267 distinct measurements across 6 parameters, most recent sample Dec 01, 2022.

By reporting year

Distinct results by reporting year
Reporting year (July–June)Distinct resultsParametersWith several versionsFirst sampleLast sample
2022153 0 Dec 01, 2022Dec 01, 2022
2021303 0 Nov 09, 2021Mar 03, 2022
2020453 0 Jan 28, 2021Mar 18, 2021
2019303 0 Dec 02, 2019Dec 18, 2019
2018453 0 Nov 27, 2018Jan 15, 2019
2017453 0 Jan 18, 2018Mar 13, 2018
2016333 0 Jan 18, 2017Nov 15, 2017
2015244 0 Nov 24, 2015May 18, 2016

By parameter

Distinct results by parameter
ParameterUnitsMeasurementsBelow detectionFirst sampleLast sampleResults
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)mg/L87 1Nov 24, 2015Dec 01, 2022 Results
Oil and Greasemg/L81 66Jan 18, 2017Dec 01, 2022 Results
pHSU81 3Jan 18, 2017Dec 01, 2022 Results
Diesel Oilmg/L6 0Nov 24, 2015May 18, 2016 Results
Gasolinemg/L6 0Nov 24, 2015May 18, 2016 Results
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)mg/L6 0Nov 24, 2015May 18, 2016 Results

Diesel Oil results (6 distinct rows, show all)

Reported monitoring results, newest first
Sample dateParameterResultUnitsLocation typeEventMethodReportVersions
May 18, 2016 Diesel Oil 1500 mg/L Effluent Qualifying Storm Event 8260TPH 873009
May 04, 2016 Diesel Oil 1500 mg/L Effluent Qualifying Storm Event 8260TPH 873009
May 04, 2016 Diesel Oil 1720 mg/L Effluent Qualifying Storm Event 8260TPH 873009
Nov 24, 2015 Diesel Oil 965 mg/L Effluent Qualifying Storm Event 8260TPH 873009
Nov 24, 2015 Diesel Oil 965 mg/L Effluent Qualifying Storm Event 8260TPH 873009
Nov 24, 2015 Diesel Oil 693 mg/L Effluent Qualifying Storm Event 8260TPH 873009

Results are shown exactly as reported by the discharger. Identical rows repeated in the State's export are shown once. Where the export contains different versions of the same sample and parameter, each version is listed and flagged. Details.

Compliance and enforcement records Evidence: SMARTS record

These are records as the State Water Board publishes them in SMARTS, with the source's own types and statuses. They are not a compliance determination or rating. A record listed here is not proof of a violation beyond what the source states, and the absence of records does not establish compliance.

Compliance and enforcement records by type
Record typeRecordsAs publishedDatesRetrievedList
Violations8 8 Violation · 0 Potential (preliminary) · 0 Dismissed Jul 01, 2002 – Jul 16, 2026 Oct 21, 2026 All violations
Enforcement actions7 7 issued · 0 draft · 0 withdrawn, rescinded or superseded Aug 12, 2002 – Jul 22, 2026 Oct 21, 2026 All actions
Inspections2inspections, not findings Aug 07, 2002 – Oct 21, 2008 Oct 21, 2026 All inspections
Annual reports11certified reports (contents not shown) 2015 – 2025 Oct 21, 2026 All reports
Water-quality-based corrective action reports0reports, by parameter — Oct 21, 2026

Each record type is counted by its own SMARTS identifier. A violation and the enforcement action that cites it are two records in two lists; they are never added together.

Chronological record history (28 records, newest first)
Compliance and enforcement records, newest first
DateRecordIDType or purposeStatus as publishedDetail
Aug 12, 2002 Enforcement actions 248390 SEL (Staff Enforcement Letter) Historical
Aug 07, 2002 Inspections 326411 B Type compliance —
Jul 01, 2002 Violations 220288 Deficient BMP Implementation ViolationInspection

Sources and provenance

Sources behind this page
InformationSourceRetrieved or published
Permit, location, receiving-water textSMARTS Industrial Application Specific DataOct 20, 2026
Permit historySMARTS Storm Water ApplicationsOct 20, 2026
Monitoring resultsSMARTS Industrial Parameter DataOct 20, 2026
Watershed Boundary Dataset HU2 GeoPackages 15, 16, 18 (WBDHU12)USGS2026-10-22
2026 California Integrated Report, Appendix A: 2026 303(d) List (final)SWRCB2026-10-22
Final_2026_Rivers_and_Streams + Final_2026_Lakes_and_Reservoirs (FeatureServer 0)SWRCB GIS2026-10-22
SMARTS TMDL requirementsSMARTS2026-10-21

Relationships computed 2026-10-22 with methods facility_huc12/1, proximity/1, receiving_water/2, tmdl_reference/1, waterbody_huc12_ovl/1, waterbody_huc12_pub/1; proximity threshold 1.0 km.

How to read the evidence labels

Records are shown as published and are not compliance determinations. How geographic context is derived.