Big Cut Mine
Terminated WDID 5S09I022964 Placerville, El Dorado County Region 5S · Central Valley (Sacramento)
At a glance
- Permit Evidence: SMARTS record
- Terminated Industrial
- Notice of Intent (WDID code I) · Permits and applications
- Location Evidence: facility-reported
- Placerville, El Dorado County
- Region 5S · Central Valley (Sacramento) · Location · Statewide map
- Identified receiving water on the 2026 303(d) list
- Not established
- Shown only when the reported receiving water is identified and corroborated.
- 2026 Integrated Report waters within 1.0 km Evidence: geographic proximity
- 1 waterbody; 0 on the 2026 303(d) list
- Proximity only; not a discharge pathway · Nearby waterbodies
- Monitoring results Evidence: facility-reported
- None in the current exports
- Compliance and enforcement records Evidence: SMARTS record
- 2 inspections · 4 violation records · 6 enforcement actions
- Counts as published in SMARTS; not a compliance determination · Details
Each label shows where a statement comes from. How to read the labels.
Overview and location
Reported facility location HUC12 watershed Corroborated receiving water 2026 Integrated Report waterbodies nearby
Reported location Evidence: facility-reported
- Coordinates
- 38.71008, -120.78124
- Precision
- 5 decimal places
- Shared point
- No
- Matches application record
- same
Facility location as reported by the discharger in SMARTS; not a discharge point or outfall.
- Facility address
- 2261 Donovan Ranch Rd, Placerville 95757
- Regional Water Board
- 5S — Central Valley (Sacramento)
HUC12 watershed Evidence: spatial
- Indian Creek-Weber Creek HUC12 180201290603
The facility's reported location lies within this HUC12 watershed (spatial derivation); it is not a discharge location.
Permits and applications Evidence: SMARTS record
Current permit record
- Permit type
- Industrial
- Application type
- Notice of Intent (WDID code I)
- Status
- Terminated
- Operator
- Joe Hardesty
- Primary industry (SIC)
- 1442-Construction Sand and Gravel
- Application ID
- 410690
- NOI processed
- Jan 05, 2011
- Last certified
- —
- Facility size
- 131.34 Acres
- Impervious area
- 0.1 %
Retrieved from SMARTS Oct 20, 2026. Verify against SMARTS before relying on it.
Permit history
| Application | Type | Status | Processed | Terminated | Certified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 410690 | Industrial | Terminated | Jan 05, 2011 | — | — |
Every storm water application SMARTS records for this WDID, newest first (1).
Receiving water
- Reported by the facility Evidence: facility-reported
- —
- Discharges directly / indirectly
- — / — (as answered in the permit application)
No receiving-water text was reported for this permit.
Impaired waters and TMDLs
Two kinds of information, kept apart: 2026 Integrated Report waterbodies near the reported location (geographic proximity only), and TMDL records that SMARTS lists for this facility. Neither establishes where the facility discharges; see Receiving water for the facility's own statement.
Nearby waterbodies Evidence: geographic proximity
Spatial proximity only; discharge pathway not established. Being near a waterbody does not mean the facility discharges to it.
| Waterbody (2026 Integrated Report) | Distance | 2026 303(d) list | Appendix A decisions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weber Creek (El Dorado County) CAR5143206020090107213613 | 694 m | not listed | 0 |
Waterbodies within 1.0 km of the reported facility location. Method proximity/1.
SMARTS TMDL records Evidence: SMARTS-reported
No TMDL records for this facility in the SMARTS TMDL export.
Reported monitoring results Evidence: facility-reported
Numeric Action Level (NAL) screening is being independently validated and is not shown. Nothing on this page states whether a result exceeded a NAL.
No industrial monitoring results for this permit are in the current exports.
Compliance and enforcement records Evidence: SMARTS record
These are records as the State Water Board publishes them in SMARTS, with the source's own types and statuses. They are not a compliance determination or rating. A record listed here is not proof of a violation beyond what the source states, and the absence of records does not establish compliance.
| Record type | Records | As published | Dates | Retrieved | List |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Violations | 4 | 4 Violation · 0 Potential (preliminary) · 0 Dismissed | Apr 23, 2011 – Aug 15, 2015 | Oct 21, 2026 | All violations |
| Enforcement actions | 6 | 6 issued · 0 draft · 0 withdrawn, rescinded or superseded | Jun 21, 2011 – Jan 28, 2016 | Oct 21, 2026 | All actions |
| Inspections | 2 | inspections, not findings | Apr 25, 2011 – May 08, 2012 | Oct 21, 2026 | All inspections |
| Annual reports | 0 | certified reports (contents not shown) | — | Oct 21, 2026 | |
| Water-quality-based corrective action reports | 0 | reports, by parameter | — | Oct 21, 2026 |
Each record type is counted by its own SMARTS identifier. A violation and the enforcement action that cites it are two records in two lists; they are never added together.
Chronological record history (12 records, newest first)
| Date | Record | ID | Type or purpose | Status as published | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2016 | Enforcement actions | 422474 | 2nd NNC - AR (Second Notice of Non-Compliance (annual report)) | Historical | |
| Oct 30, 2015 | Enforcement actions | 420923 | NNC (Notice of Non-Compliance) | Historical | |
| Sep 16, 2015 | Enforcement actions | 420313 | 1st NNC - AR (First Notice of Non-Compliance (annual report)) | Historical | |
| Aug 15, 2015 | Violations | 858103 | Late Report | Violation | Report |
| Aug 15, 2015 | Violations | 858602 | Failure to Obtain Permit | Violation | Report |
| Oct 01, 2014 | Enforcement actions | 417027 | 2nd NNC - AR (Second Notice of Non-Compliance (annual report)) | Historical | |
| Aug 15, 2014 | Enforcement actions | 417015 | 1st NNC - AR (First Notice of Non-Compliance (annual report)) | Historical | |
| Jul 01, 2014 | Violations | 855259 | Late Report | Violation | Report |
| May 08, 2012 | Inspections | 2015910 | B Type compliance | — | Follow-up Inspection Needed |
| Jun 21, 2011 | Enforcement actions | 405859 | 13267 Letter/Order (Water Code section 13267 letter or order) | Historical | |
| Apr 25, 2011 | Inspections | 2012121 | Complaint | — | Follow-up Inspection Needed |
| Apr 23, 2011 | Violations | 844894 | Unauthorized NSWD | Violation | Inspection |
Sources and provenance
| Information | Source | Retrieved or published |
|---|---|---|
| Permit, location, receiving-water text | SMARTS Industrial Application Specific Data | Oct 20, 2026 |
| Permit history | SMARTS Storm Water Applications | Oct 20, 2026 |
| Monitoring results | SMARTS Industrial Parameter Data | Oct 20, 2026 |
| Watershed Boundary Dataset HU2 GeoPackages 15, 16, 18 (WBDHU12) | USGS | 2026-10-22 |
| 2026 California Integrated Report, Appendix A: 2026 303(d) List (final) | SWRCB | 2026-10-22 |
| Final_2026_Rivers_and_Streams + Final_2026_Lakes_and_Reservoirs (FeatureServer 0) | SWRCB GIS | 2026-10-22 |
| SMARTS TMDL requirements | SMARTS | 2026-10-21 |
Relationships computed 2026-10-22 with methods facility_huc12/1, proximity/1, receiving_water/2, tmdl_reference/1, waterbody_huc12_ovl/1, waterbody_huc12_pub/1; proximity threshold 1.0 km.
How to read the evidence labels
- Evidence: SMARTS record Evidence: facility-reported Information as published in SMARTS or reported by the discharger.
- Evidence: identification corroborated The reported receiving-water name identifies one official waterbody and the facility's location is consistent with it. It does not establish a discharge pathway.
- Evidence: candidate, awaiting review Evidence: not confirmed The reported name could match one or more official waterbodies, but no identification has been confirmed; nothing is assigned without review.
- Evidence: spatial Evidence: geographic proximity Derived from the reported location only.
- Evidence: SMARTS-reported Source records whose links to official references are not yet reviewed.
- Evidence: unavailable The information could not be loaded or is not in the sources.
Records are shown as published and are not compliance determinations. How geographic context is derived.